Home
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
Facebook
Twitter
RSS Feed
Printable version
Exchange Server 2007 Migration: Look Before You Leap
By Michelle Savage
September 15, 2008 —
(Page 5 of 6)
C2C Systems CEO Dave Hunt said the storage limitations in Exchange Server 2007 make it necessary for companies to shift some of their data to a lower-cost device, but many fail to determine at the outset which data they will and will not move. “When you’re moving into a new house, you don’t just move all your old stuff to the attic and keep it there,” he said. “It’s the same thing with your data. If you’re migrating the data anyway, now is the time to implement a plan to manage it.”
Schneiderman also advises organizations that are not fully prepared for a complete setup or migration to take their time, since Exchange Server 2007 offers the flexibility to introduce server roles gradually and to support Exchange in a coexistence mode. The end-to-end process is designed to maintain messaging functionality and stability through the transition period.
“It’s not necessary to overcomplicate things,” Schneiderman said. “You can move to 2007 and keep your current environment; just introduce the 2007 server and move your mailboxes over.”
Most migrations cannot be done over a single weekend; many take several weeks or months. During that time, it is critical that messaging functionality be up and running without interruption, even when some user accounts are housed in Exchange Server 2007 and others remain in the source messaging platform. If administrators fail to establish coexistence between the messaging environments, users lose the ability to e-mail and schedule meetings with each other, share global address lists and view public folders.
To establish coexistence effectively, administrators must synchronize Active Directory and Exchange data—including directories, public folders and calendars—so that any changes made in one environment will be replicated in the other. By doing so, they can eliminate productivity losses due to interrupted workflow.
The upside to choosing a phased approach, said Schneiderman, is that if something goes wrong because of technical or human error, the organization will not have to roll back thousands of mailboxes at once.
Next Page
Related Search Term(s):
Exchange Server
,
ITIL
,
migration
,
server management
,
Microsoft
Pages
1
2
3
4
5
6
Share this link:
http://www.sptechweb.com/link/32847
Related Articles
Windows Essential Server Solutions Slated for Fall
Windows Small Business Server 2008 and Windows Essential Business Server 2008 have reached the Release Candidate 1 milestone, and they will launch on Nov. 12 of this year.
The Microsoft Stack: No Need to Hesitate on SQL Server 2008 Migration
The benefits that SQL Server 2008 offers are numerous, such as making good use of 64-bit processors and improvements to OLAP. It can also use spatial data and seems to be designed to work with Web 2.0 implementations.
Live From Microsoft Tech·Ed IT Professionals—Wednesday, June 11
The second day of TechEd featured sessions covering best practices for Microsoft SQL Server 2008, implementing virtualization using Microsoft IT and the drive for 64-bit computing. Bamboo Solutions and NetApp announced new products.